Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Matthias Urlichs <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09.05.25 19:20, Russ Allbery wrote: > Matthias Urlichs<[email protected]> writes: > >> The problem is that all those missing factors are destined to go >> un-missing — and then what? We can't base our rules on biological >> exceptionalism. > Why not? The entirety of law, politics, and civilization is designed by > humans, I'm not disputing any of that. *Of course* we should write our rules and laws to benefit humans / humanity, not robots or AIs or corporate profiteering or what-have-you. All I'm saying is that the idea "a human can examine a lot of copyrighted stuff and then produce non-copyrighted output but a computer cannot" might still hold some water today, but the bucket is leaky and getting leakier every couple of months, if not weeks. -- -- regards -- -- Matthias Urlichs
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEr9eXgvO67AILKKGfcs+OXiW0wpMFAmgebYcFAwAAAAAACgkQcs+OXiW0wpM5 Hw//R8IR9mFE6qXqLemKKrCKfJ6bgy7f3/tN9bpF1hjlGp1t8bw1avy1CN9FhYxPKkpSgtcmn0E/ J0uo7ZyAmDP+dtWRFmXanEzoY5utXzCLBykRNN9OZRYPwD0eubETEchC1zFOPbh28LldHpWQmT9U snLQzXSzzDt4aqN3dNBbQcTrzeg0W/VQhIOA2ql7BgFJ2buIKmFH8SB8/gCQw7W8b/Oxs9BNvv3e McfusyPA9Gew+9qd2cKtsf9Onb/7kNF8Ew7jUO/Ow9cs3v6Dll8PgbK61q+J7DkNB6KPq+RPtLou wFCtxOMYCoKTvYqnbt4vsfhJPpkUA/LFFupDrsejESS9LRaIdNwBgCAvSU9lveKy5VA8NBGP3U/f MSvv9qKyiGnmMBeUDDQvRS3uZ6n7F4t7L9T6Pu0NZ4NM67lTHOAVg2tRcl19L1oD5Q29MiWjGDQv 3RHSY0lBQzzebWn933CggoEM+NVp2pXIsLTw7YfiTNv5h283mext3BWbLhN40b+u0+PDiQqFyD3B YZ2MTzUkodQjcR5c6vRzWrn6R6fNTKZlXv+aK0l7lo3IjA752VpkP379uIAUDeuinUiqCWyhQ3JB wpTfSsKCDpVMlJM4R/3bVsAIVlW1MnOp2UOm1FRH7SEdWXrYYQV1L4dA6XcbaOskTpl4rCoO37U6 +2E= =6zES -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----