Re: Proposal A Amendament (was: Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models

Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 03:41:14PM -0400, M. Zhou wrote:
> The issue is also discussed here:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/1019028/
> 
> A better wording goes:
> s/open source license/DFSG-compatible license/g
> 
> It is fixed in the git repo:
> https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg/-/commit/9496f9fb6405db5a99fff1672cd4bad66c925c24
> 
> The proposal after amendament:
> 
> ===============================================================================
> Proposal A: "AI models released under DFSG-compatible license license without
>             original training data or program" are not seen as DFSG-compliant.
> ===============================================================================
> 
> The "AI models released under DFSG-compatible license license without original
> training data or program", a particular type of files as explained above, are
> not seen as DFSG-compliant. Hence, they can not be included in the "main"
> section of the Debian archive. This proposal does not specify whether the
> "non-free" section of Debian archive can include those files.

I did a s/license license/license/ on that.


Kurt
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.