Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models

Russ Allbery <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Organization The Eyrie
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes:

> Thanks for writing this!  I find myself in agreement with most (if not
> all) of it, but what is puzzling me is how this differs from the other
> proposals presented earlier.

> Is it possible give a short summary of principles that differs in your
> thinking from Thorsten Glaser's proposal?  I find find myself agreeing
> with both of you.

I don't know that it does differ! To be honest, I was trying to reduce the
amount of time I was spending on this discussion (I certainly failed at
that), and therefore was doing the old debian-vote hack of only paying
close attention to proposals that had reached the required number of
seconds and relying on other people to winnow down the number of things I
had to examine in detail. So I have not taken a close look at the
specifics of Thorston's proposal (other than the side point that I don't
think we know whether non-free firmware contains machine learning models
and therefore aren't really in a position to make rules about that).
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.