Re: GR -- Allow AI-Assisted Contributions
Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 11:23:09AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: >But as you say, for some people the arguments they make against the >use of "AI" (whatever the hell that means) is about the consequences, >either real or imagined or projected, that they think the technology >will have. > >And the problem here is that it's still early days, and some of the >initial estimates about (for example) water usage of AI queries seem >to have been half-baked, or at least, highly disputed. For example, >instead of a 16 ounce of bottled water, there are other estimates that >put it at 45 mililiters, or even 0.26 milliliters. One of the reasons >behind the wide disparity is about how to account for the cost of >training the LLM. That's a one-time cost, and as the number of >queries go up, that cost will get amortized and go down significantly. >It's also the case that if you believe that the LLM is going to be >trained *anyway*, the water savings of foregoing the use of the LLM >for code reviews, or cherry-picking of a patch, or even vibe-coding is >probably going to be in the mililiter range as opposed to the entire >bottle of water range. > >I think people also tend to under-estimate how much water gets used >when creating their pair of jeans (estimates range from 4,000 liters >to 10,000 liters), or how much water they use when taking their daily >showers, or how much CO2 they produce when travelling to conferences >or visiting their families. (OMG! An Open Source maintainer is >travelling all over the world to go to conferences! Let's ban the use >of their software in Debian!! *That* will solve the global warming >crisis....) Another interesting comparison is resources spent on CI. So far I see that both OSS and commercial development adopts more and more CI and QA tools, spending more and more CPU cycles on running them during the development. That, of course, is true for Debian too. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 894 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEtf6ieDcfC1EgtGkao+OWn23e7IYFAmmYjGktFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEKPjlp9t3uyG XWwP/2y8Nxa5bvdI6kQkAI1Y0bgtHAQC8dytAVr7C1B8SSyZ4mAgIXeeTUCONw5A Hoi2gj7OgJJrC159gGeY+S3D8mi0cJy6BmqboGI53rXwVrKtbgB4ZCNBpTpSuqsI TmyrfoXQBw0TRdAeUHmuhKfrivoG9R8iwmapDW9q6i9lti5zQSNGDJR3QjTb4dKt 8nY35ZFmuGIqoTDBojf3RnEHQlXEWoK/QQG9KQvESB+TixjPxShuvV6gsANh3JWo mGkay+FzguvkUbdbznp+oyVQNRq0cwo4sYIQttCGppP2bYdS0RSE/x438TcJ4T7I wgez0qqVi3S0FhkeAa480+eocD8lDbK2XWr0iznjj3avJjmcHqMX/7jThaWIYmF0 feTk3bWiedighJXSZbX9NySJJOpnO0Cb7UsYtf/2HH7M6kkWleRpEir44Ogvqu6o 1JNCd0HQcwcznS7SXTL0TyzHAMs+ZQUoYQsEX1sxNCGNWbt/A9YX5uD141BBaqG8 wFNKwQ+YO681242h8KLdMTS3lVha+ynr7M0Y5bkCC6X7g5a3c/VAH8gerMMXoFvE +p480+PbsDbo9RXkCu0rfi/npqaI8vOAhs2ZXosGGPE/0wQWbm3zLfX5qlvTPwiU shHc2n9/Ki+IxLgfd36plzcE+DuLvNROoXvtfHxkHPsK5TSv =dK59 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----