Re: Q: Technical Visions
Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sean Whitton dijo [Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 10:18:57AM +0100]: >> From whatever I have observed in recent DPL tenures, there were no >> strong technical driving force, rather facilitating solving technical >> issues. I also plan to do similarly during my tenure. For example, I am >> a strong supporter of team maintained packages, but that does not mean I >> would/should force everyone to quit single maintainer practice. I would >> start more conversations around this instead and try to find a solution. >> >> So, I urge everyone to bring to notice the issues that they think are >> important for the project so that we can discuss and find some solution. > >Per the Constitution, the DPL is meant to provide technical leadership >as well, but as you say, we've somewhat drifted away from that. > >I would like to see a return a DPLs leading across all aspects of the >project. Well, we have had recent DPLs who have worked in reimplementing socio-technical interpretations in many ways. I do not think a DPL should worry in being competent enough _across all technical expressions of our project_ (that would be humanly impossible!), but I am sure a DPL, no matter their background, will push either for socio-technical inertia in areas they see fit, or changes in areas they see as problematic...