Re: Q: Debian as a registered organization

Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <adLFo1X1pkBYFdSh@localhost>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 08:47:37PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 4/3/26 10:40 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 11:38:22PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > > ...
> > > If we become a registered entity, it'd be a way more easy for governments to
> > > get us accounted for. Even more in the case of a USA-registered Foundation.
> > > While with the current case, it'd be a way harder for Debian to get into
> > > trouble. For example, the foundation could be sued, and we'd have to pay for
> > > such trial in USA. But with the current state, one would have to go after
> > > single individuals.
> > > ...
> > 
> > It is strange that you consider going after single Debian members as
> > preferable for Debian, single individuals are usually easier targets
> > than large organizations.
> 
> The idea is that the individual(s) involved may not be in the same country,
> making it even more difficult. Or even, impossible for a government to go
> after all of use at once, as there would be no legal organization to
> dissolve.

When the French government goes after Debian it is fine for you when 
they arrest all DDs in France, like they did with Pavel Durov?

And if a DD in France had a house or apartment or some savings, it is 
fine for you when this gets confiscated to compensate for whatever
penalties France wants to impose on Debian?

> Cheers,
> 
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)

cu
Adrian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.