Re: GR: Ban LLM contributions from Debian

Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2026-07-22 19:45:34)
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:30, Pierre-Elliott Bécue <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> [...]
> >
> >These apply exclusively to code and work done specifically for the
> >Debian project (Debian websites, applications, resources, packages,
> >etc.). They do not apply to any upstream work. In what follows, "work"
> >refers to work covered by these guidelines.
> >
> > - All code and work assisted by a generative AI agent or tool must
> >   comply with the DFSG.
> > - The submitter is solely responsible for the submitted work and, by
> >   submitting it, certifies that:
> >   + any generated code has been reviewed and audited;
> >   + all licensing-compliance duties have been fulfilled;
> >
> Sorry, but I fail to see how code generated by LLMs can ever comply with 
> the DFSG. TTBOMK no model exists that a) was solely trained on 
> DFSG-software, b) has DFSG-compatible licensing on itself and c) denotes 
> from where in the training data the output comes from.

Already today, human Debian contributors exist that use non-free
tooling like Gmail, and most likely human Debian contributors exist
that are trained on non-free licensed data. So I fail to undertand the
argument above.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
 * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.