Re: GR: Ban LLM contributions from Debian
Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:15:11AM +0900, Simon Richter wrote: >>I haven't researched why did Linux decide to do this (it may have >>something to do with the unique Linux-specific culture of adding all >>sorts of metadata to submitted patches?) but I don't see much value >>in it, besides being helpful to deprioritize submissions produced >>with garbage level models. > >Preserving this metadata is a valid way to handle the legal >uncertainty about whether LLM output can ever be copyrightable, That doesn't seem to require specifying anything more than a bool "some output is from some LLM" flag. -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 894 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEtf6ieDcfC1EgtGkao+OWn23e7IYFAmphsq4tFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEKPjlp9t3uyG WTUQAKs62aRY0HL29qWj+xX1c9yrY1OZ44jyDtCfCLWWIUGKScZnq3rzvZ7yc20g bMxTaMpheqV8oh9RAWVAree4fv6gkOBjqUXozWwaFgotvUTpxrkms7xM4aBywSFc 37mMg3vszBqcjIyErWdvBFcME9KBgTRLBmc71tI+3cb3o+hLL2uhEOjEyYLTjXjn VD2SlgfUNTmHVC5Ey87AVhfg23I8PvMqoeZuY4G/XeeVDiP44JQEuS8CM+xnY1f1 qdwbLJpZtFQOcvY4d0q/zptKZqF0s9+W/+wCEahUun4x18/f6veM69tvUsFz+Hps KB12tkxSue8UOFpa0/94QVg3PAhAMMKa3x+Vx1u7y/Bqmr0DWppLAOGT8royIAQx V74C61KTM2BWk5WBRtXRm8ve1Xyccmp4k2JWpTJ+eTtAL0SN17ljLyh3b38Rokrc zTAZ7BXH84MSZ1JUAT/hUsfUC5uCqzmfQceJOpcV52rr2RVThnuapsD5uaIuPvHp M4lGQnwQoQLntxIIVq6Xa3cqdqfOED6X3kk5qtJPPn6yy6jjX94cd+w2roDqfFuz /il53NuRQNM2BNMRYVeHldM5kQhLjq9Zyux5SxSmhY+88PqXJTtl/vnhDTGyyDdX CKKbNnR2bMirdxZYoU7BBHbpyUXzT4qUYMpzgp1cvsU34KxD =yC5a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----