Re: ungarbled and properly wrapped (was: Re: GR: Ban LLM contributions from Debian)

Marc Haber <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:07:43AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
>The scope of this GR is (non-exhaustive):
>- Debian source packages
>- Official Debian project software, such as lintian
>- Debian web resources
>- Documentation and translations added by Debian contributors
>- Official communication from Debian
>
>It does not include:
>- Upstream projects using LLMs for development
>- AI-related software

I need clarification for that. 


Does this mean, that

(1)
I still have to manually grep trough the sources of a package I maintain 
to manually create debian/copyright files instead of uploading the 
source package to an LLM asking for a debian/copyright file (and of 
course sampling whether the output makes sense)?

(2)
I can use all LLMs I want to create a program like the Linux Kernel, or 
some other tool that might be useful, put it under a DFSG-free license, 
but need to hand-write my debian/ directory if I decide to make that 
program available in Debian?

The older among us might remember a GR that was titled "Editorial 
Changes" and sounded sensible and well-meaning, but once accepted by the 
Project, caused us to have a huge discussion about "what is software" 
and that delayed a release by a year (if I remember correctly). I should 
have rated that proposal below NOTA back then, so I have made a rule for 
me to not vote for a GR until I have understood the possible 
consequences.

This GR has a WAY bigger blast radius than the Editoral Changes from 20 
years ago. It could kill Debian.

Greetings
Marc
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.