Re: ungarbled and properly wrapped (was: Re: GR: Ban LLM contributions from Debian)
Marc Haber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:07:43AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: >The scope of this GR is (non-exhaustive): >- Debian source packages >- Official Debian project software, such as lintian >- Debian web resources >- Documentation and translations added by Debian contributors >- Official communication from Debian > >It does not include: >- Upstream projects using LLMs for development >- AI-related software I need clarification for that. Does this mean, that (1) I still have to manually grep trough the sources of a package I maintain to manually create debian/copyright files instead of uploading the source package to an LLM asking for a debian/copyright file (and of course sampling whether the output makes sense)? (2) I can use all LLMs I want to create a program like the Linux Kernel, or some other tool that might be useful, put it under a DFSG-free license, but need to hand-write my debian/ directory if I decide to make that program available in Debian? The older among us might remember a GR that was titled "Editorial Changes" and sounded sensible and well-meaning, but once accepted by the Project, caused us to have a huge discussion about "what is software" and that delayed a release by a year (if I remember correctly). I should have rated that proposal below NOTA back then, so I have made a rule for me to not vote for a GR until I have understood the possible consequences. This GR has a WAY bigger blast radius than the Editoral Changes from 20 years ago. It could kill Debian. Greetings Marc