Re: ungarbled and properly wrapped (was: Re: GR: Ban LLM contributions from Debian)
Matthias Geiger <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:54:06 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:12, Marc Haber <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 11:07:43AM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote: >>The scope of this GR is (non-exhaustive): >>- Debian source packages >>- Official Debian project software, such as lintian >>- Debian web resources >>- Documentation and translations added by Debian contributors >>- Official communication from Debian >> >>It does not include: >>- Upstream projects using LLMs for development >>- AI-related software > >I need clarification for that. > > >Does this mean, that > >(1) >I still have to manually grep trough the sources of a package I maintain >to manually create debian/copyright files instead of uploading the >source package to an LLM asking for a debian/copyright file (and of >course sampling whether the output makes sense)? > Yes, how every package so far has been created. If we can't trust contributors to write a proper d/copyright file by themselves we might aswell give up on the NEW queue. Part of Debians' trust is that we precisely document every source file shipped by the package. >(2) >I can use all LLMs I want to create a program like the Linux Kernel, or >some other tool that might be useful, put it under a DFSG-free license, >but need to hand-write my debian/ directory if I decide to make that >program available in Debian? > Yes. >The older among us might remember a GR that was titled "Editorial >Changes" and sounded sensible and well-meaning, but once accepted by >the Project, caused us to have a huge discussion about "what is >software" and that delayed a release by a year (if I remember >correctly). I should have rated that proposal below NOTA back then, so >I have made a rule for me to not vote for a GR until I have understood >the possible consequences. > >This GR has a WAY bigger blast radius than the Editoral Changes from 20 >years ago. It could kill Debian. > Debian has been around for over 30 years, I highly doubt that a (possible) restriction on LLMs (around ~5 years) will change that. best,