Re: GR: Ban LLM contributions from Debian
Matthias Urlichs <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:53:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27.07.26 10:24, Gard Spreemann wrote: > a person is > still writing a precise set of instructions when they write C or > JavaScript I would contend that there are heaps of edge cases in both C and JavaScript where the intended meaning and/or the result is *not* precise[ly specified]. At all. Yes, translating a more-or-less-correct/complete specification to code is (for the most part) not going to be one-shot and/or deterministic when you give the job to an LLM, but the same thing happens when you hand the spec to a junior programmer. The LLM might make more stupid mistakes or start out with worse assumptions, but on the other hand it'll happily write more tests — and it's not going to lose its motivation when you *finally* notice that glaring error in the spec and force it to throw away half the code it wrote last week … -- -- regards -- -- Matthias Urlichs
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEr9eXgvO67AILKKGfcs+OXiW0wpMFAmpnmzUFAwAAAAAACgkQcs+OXiW0wpM7 XQ//YIL1TEsHnoo81JAXoueCqXF1EksQsbnYLnd8y94h6MCkG1HCxPY50DDMut3EGXMsCNEctV/h RkETBIPljrH5o8IihA/CmGI5yoaUiTx/yxzllWzivzIkOYpvy0Fur4q/jhy2bWRkfQWjXxzzmXnd aYgysUW3k00Qd5TyKq14Mo+sJKGCUp6/YpDxu1wG88za0XWToC7l2iOw+8QQT66CgL1BG1ie/FCA 3/fB75nQRG9ZThomnuebCJPp+u7ov0zfnnmRbG5ZDfPxr52xwQP/A3NMNjg3XtDri9gjIXVDHh4I Tzn5qB+c/yPezSjbyUyP7KxAKYXvZwDnhVdzuipjyXXu6EdiqTTLQKskOrEGwa5XdjCzMG8i34nI 3zjzY6ddxfT0yHuMYp5jnGk8xl7wlnlyDJQiG5rKKabnN3IeRXIZEzwER6klmRoQi2V578Vzv1uB cQICNkvDg8aYFz4TxLPrz6TtZrVARjiK3qrrM5hyVvqzCvMEWFzckm//S9UWIg6xy3To5AM9j/q8 MDYajw/8ai9XXk4MBWUYjdz6eQnGNeuPYMrgTSOr5XtY59xK4CGHANYOduoX2HJQcN3ic1Dc9+5w mve6UxHwZh39MAeqFApsbDddJMWpmVh6LfvBZwPKe45VFThXNPjbw4l9XF2czah5U8efFUcwxs9n jOM= =vLge -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----