Re: Draft permissive ballot option (was: GR: Ban LLM contributions from Debian)
Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 01:50:33 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Marc (and others) On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 11:48:55PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: ... >> If someone were to file an LLM-generated bug report, or MR, or >> something, we would probably close it, stating this (package-specific) >> policy. > >By ignoring a valid bug report, you're violating the social contract which >says that our focus is on our users. That's another can of worms. Nowhere in the social contract do we promise any focus on interacting with AI bots. Would you want to force people to spend time on dealing with the kind of slop "bug reports" that the curl project has been infamously dealing with? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] < Aardvark> I dislike C++ to start with. C++11 just seems to be handing rope-creating factories for users to hang multiple instances of themselves.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEzrtSMB1hfpEDkP4WWHl5VzRCaE4FAmppTlkACgkQWHl5VzRC aE6RGA/+L/CJ3d/nFHQWKf36bwNsA9Gl8Ben3mdA6tkNyME1uQ0YZjgZjX5OoDd3 gVfO650DtBiD5jsI/rZcj+EZwR8lFnSarEZpN+Dto8dntR5WbQ3mwWBShmnvX4dR YJyT0Lw2vytOlrNCK9baWBuOkW5zGHQlXbuo7djrXIE41lXpKTs1Dz9AGj8tGKTG A+Od9/Z0ijwiMtsCvafqBCaB/Ghw+4yAn2PHGuHIyl5pgRLDblPJ2dYELNdWGpj/ 8rPyyd82wR7m2DjGcSw1Ptcpy8+P2kU/+6NUAr2AyHgbZzwKbAwJvWuVaeMjVBxh A+3+i8+tKLRP5Uwtm4RI4HSHN5YinuTvKYIvEUy2Wr3yRan/TNNaR1SRBVpPdtdK NSAGGcDCEuTz4kf4b008Glbb0Z5thus2xHdOL+8NifWKJTCUqHMn7hTPeCWuW8/+ QiUtDF0iGMt7PN05rEQL1MrxGDnkLg5LjrDVCumuGJH/f0nxWkkCfgJtrirZwWqT ncRMGbVp3KaNviIkxQi3LRzelwYnJDquVISTMk524Jv7CGaKZHZPvMftrK6N+Ndj n1kpxrHCLKwO9C9ThBWx8NtklI5Axe8nXC1ReQQSiu03FI3KTQvccwld4K4pNpOj LEZSLJGiVghvS1dyoSS0N0I1Wl5pDg9i/VZUgg5PVGknu9pQyPg= =zSco -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----