Re: GR: Ban LLM contributions from Debian

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> writes:

> I was instead looking for the opposite - i.e. allow individual projects
> to be more permissive.

Thanks for making this clarification.  It's what I thought you were
asking for.

While I personally agree with many of the concerns expressed about what
we've seen so far in the way of LLM-assisted contributions, the
discussions here on debian-vote have made it clear to me that we are
nowhere near having a project-wide consensus on how to treat "AI" in=20
Debian.

That probably means a GR is premature, though discussing one may indeed
be the only way to advance our collective understanding of the issues.
If this GR goes to a vote soon, I am highly likely to vote any proposal
that does not allow per-maintainer or per-team decision making below
further discussion.

Bdale

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/OeM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--