Re: LLM usage in Debian -- ballot options comparison

Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 07:36:46 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--GlF/4VH+bVgkwPnB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Holger,

On 30/07/26 at 01:32 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 08:50:05PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > With the assistance of AI...
>=20
> I dont think I am the only one who finds this a tiny bit (cough) offensiv=
e,
> we are discussing whether using AI should be forbidden and you just smoke=
 in
> the shared space thinking the GR will allow that.
>=20
> (I do appreciate your honesty and I also suspect smoking^IA will soon be
> permitted everywhere...)

We are also discussing whether using AI should be allowed -- I don't
think it's fair to ask people to follow the rules enforced by one of the
ballot options until it has won.

If proposals A (and probably C) won, I would of course respect the
outcome, and stop using AI in the context of Debian (which would
probably mean stopping most of my contributions, because I don't think
I'll find the motivation to continue).

Now, I'd like to point out that my mail:
* disclosed the use of AI at the start, so you can stop reading there
* uses AI for a use case (summarizing stuff) where the output is easy to
  check
* points to AI-assisted content, but is not AI-assisted itself. Ian
  declined to comment if that would be a CoC violation if Proposal C won
  (see my last example, and his follow-up in
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/07/msg00175.html )

Of course, besides the comparison of options which I believe is useful
in itself, my mail is also intended as an example of how AI could help
*improve* human-to-human communications by providing summarizes of
complex discussions.

And in the interest of saving kittens/resources, I think that it is
useful to share such outputs to avoid having several people run the
exact same analysis.

Lucas

--GlF/4VH+bVgkwPnB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=cQjf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--GlF/4VH+bVgkwPnB--