Re: LLM usage in Debian -- ballot options comparison
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 07:36:46 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--GlF/4VH+bVgkwPnB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Holger, On 30/07/26 at 01:32 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 08:50:05PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > With the assistance of AI... >=20 > I dont think I am the only one who finds this a tiny bit (cough) offensiv= e, > we are discussing whether using AI should be forbidden and you just smoke= in > the shared space thinking the GR will allow that. >=20 > (I do appreciate your honesty and I also suspect smoking^IA will soon be > permitted everywhere...) We are also discussing whether using AI should be allowed -- I don't think it's fair to ask people to follow the rules enforced by one of the ballot options until it has won. If proposals A (and probably C) won, I would of course respect the outcome, and stop using AI in the context of Debian (which would probably mean stopping most of my contributions, because I don't think I'll find the motivation to continue). Now, I'd like to point out that my mail: * disclosed the use of AI at the start, so you can stop reading there * uses AI for a use case (summarizing stuff) where the output is easy to check * points to AI-assisted content, but is not AI-assisted itself. Ian declined to comment if that would be a CoC violation if Proposal C won (see my last example, and his follow-up in https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/07/msg00175.html ) Of course, besides the comparison of options which I believe is useful in itself, my mail is also intended as an example of how AI could help *improve* human-to-human communications by providing summarizes of complex discussions. And in the interest of saving kittens/resources, I think that it is useful to share such outputs to avoid having several people run the exact same analysis. Lucas --GlF/4VH+bVgkwPnB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE/t7ByzN7z1CfQ8IkORS1MvTfvpkFAmpq4u0ACgkQORS1MvTf vplg/g//ecq+mYr9Dajg3WURlukU/7xT4tTegFzeu82PPUiKtY2Ek219w3jbLaVs EsGRiyAMt/4ux4Fpzx9iRCRDbaCPMkD2+21Hmha1APU1Hg4wOYFFgfh0UwXxATjE qUVLxQ6P5vvun12ceqWiQntaN0FUnXGijv+eQ+vhPikaG7KLHhzBz1bmfRfA0YE7 3YWz5Ex4mnp5sekXLGgi7nOg38wfehs8ukTtkp/9TtT1T179Wt73I4A91N1mrdm9 TovrsnNuyuZmTSJPz3fmfEU4fgTdvKfZCr2vlaVkRyKcmZrp+l2tfEeC4uUDlvMf PUdzJVKIKg7SidAy+gMbkEgYC87UcKW2QE/9KtlEvOdYKCUlp+5jNy7eBJPta2hY YYtB2/IbeuWMU7zdM9MRkl+P/pjyyai6zCrSvvONY7O4FOKuGJGhMm6P9VI+nK7r 0rPwPEC/f2YQM+RzYjga4tg2GAT9MSatkTe7OBgK4Z7/00WJDGcfYuvRGufu7Syj lLSYlJlm3cFdtC1XvL1pLNh0vE4LVGQ2fFJDbDfT0TX14d4X4aaIoV5RDRlVsnqK uWG/6uvSeCmlqsLkF3IrDeumqX169zzFJUe3iKMDlpvP1bUun/uF4ssH4krZXPBZ 6p1IKWk0ShKJmAsucDkcpGS20WgSXERNcfdkys3ctEzTNqOs7bg= =cQjf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GlF/4VH+bVgkwPnB--