Re: LLM usage in Debian -- ballot options comparison
"Joseph R. Justice" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 03:13:25 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC58tq_Lo9N+rpH3XoqtEFExfsDg7=+DHY1unzvTQHtzH2gmUA@mail.gmail.com> |
[This message contains no AI generated content, not even suggested enhancements or corrections from Clippy!. Again, you probably didn't know it, but I am a dog on the Internet.] On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 2:33=E2=80=AFAM Marc Haber <mh+debian-vote@zugschlu= s.de> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 01:26:58AM -0400, Joseph R. Justice wrote: > [drivel deleted] > > If you want people to read what you write, don't make it intentionally > unreadable. > > didn't read. > > Greetings > Marc, resisting the temptation of pasting this abomination to an LLM to > make it understandable FWIW, Mr. Haber, I don't consider your message in response to mine to be an abomination, or in any way not understandable. I think I understood your message very well. I'm sorry and consider it regretful that you consider text you yourself wrote to be an abomination; I'm not sure what else to say concerning that. Also FWIW, I didn't make my original message intentionally unreadable (as least in my own estimation), nor do I myself find it unreadable. I can understand however that others might not find it the same way, for whatever reason. I respect that. Did you look at the followup I posted to my original message (assuming you yourself are willing to interact with AI generated content, as it was clearly announced to be at the beginning of the followup to my original message) that was created by Google GMail (Clippy!) from the message I originally posted, as an improvement (or, so says Google GMail) to that message? If you did look at it, did you find it any more readable than the original message? As the person who wrote the original message, I find Clippy's purported improvement of it to be not unreasonable; there's perhaps some subtle points in the original that were not incorporated in the summary / improvement, but overall it's a fair and reasonably complete summary IMO. If you did not look at it, and again if you are willing to engage with AI generated content in the first place, perhaps you might wish to do so? You might find it (more) comprehensible? Thanks for your response to me, and for whatever time (if any) you choose to expend in reading my response to you in return. Be well, take care, do good things. Joseph > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- > Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Head= er > Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 16004= 02 > Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 16004= 21 >