Re: Third update of the ballot option: Call the Free Software community to develop Free AI.

>On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 07:04:29AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> 
>> Would you consider replacing the current versions with
>> human-edited versions of your drafts or notes before you used AI ?

Le Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 08:44:42PM +0200, Tobias Frost a écrit :
>
> It went through multiple iterations before arriving at the current
> version, which reflects my own judgment and the outcome I wanted to
> achieve.
> […]
> an LLM can act as a drafting and language-assistance tool without
> replacing my own ideas, reasoning, or responsibility for the final
> text.
> 
> For that reason, I do not intend to replace the current version
>
> Shameless plug: the proposal is still looking for seconders.
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/07/msg00343.html

Hi Tobias,

thank for your kind answer.  I really appreciate it.

Your proposal has something that like a lot and that I have not found in
the other ones:

     "courtesy to fellow contributors"

This is basically what I tried to acheive with mine, and this is the
reason why I do not use AI in this thread.  I think that after proposals
A and C lose to alternatives, it will be easier to keep on working
together if the winning alternative was not drafted to AI, because it
sends the message of "Although I disagree with you, I undestand your
feelings, let's shake hands".

I did not plan to insist, but since you wrote that you miss a second
and since I can be that person…

If you would send me your last draft before AI edition, I would be happy
to propose minor revisions and second it.  Maybe the other people who
seconded your ballot would be pleased to the same?  Maybe people who
seconded ballot A would second it?

Have a nice week-end,

Charles