Re: LLM usage in Debian -- ballot options comparison
Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 05:19:19PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Providing easier access to LLMs via paid-for API services to active Debian > contributors is not too dissimilar to sponsoring their LWN subscription, or an > Office 365 plan, frankly. to me it is, the environmental impact is way way way worse. and the social impact too. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ The hardest part about defending against social engineering is that it doesn't attack attack the weakness of a community. It attacks its *strengths*: trust, collaboration, and mutual assistance. (Russ Allbery)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmp3EjoACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhxAxA//RbtZIIJ1i/3onUp/XMT4JNOYIMEeodfDUGrOd+ertw3iYLQrYC1jZRwU HUz6gXr5hZpGM/IHaL8YlhdhnrrXWliZpYjyryKf8UpQ4Tf1CYj4CW9mj21EiurC tc/OqqRaR8iN8wqo//H6iTH2n+VUHfljDW7opz0vXpeF0MOWNoJEA3tq3afu2849 /8zK0Sx8hLglKKpnn4YlGKeyyxu7JNClMXaJZ7FepAfOzCjN4gTKgxzh1mIGwLSi fnYT7bDrjDh/XCXnoNeE/6ZF2F68z13Aeu0qVGXHReqPoZCjivutnBK9qt0g+YBX 4AMLyPEm2lpCrH6z3KA6YZLX0T+WCF2rEvEi+VOahqngV/yGFU/imN5M6EWkVztG tZoGr3jqoipY7cqtsXFqVI3oweaWSBX6wnTTbhHF98jEDfKSb2Uzqwof8ZBFDY17 9v75BMfw5i/En/0s9Cc38j5qUBBRppJhGKDAVlCs6YKL3CmVI2YnAg7u3MrRuUVc 3TR3h+X1VSs+y0nNobGS0B+gFpQM75VtmNP0ZdHbwGCY976WxWty+f5qwGSUfrXU 3+qtcOkOmVZjJSGW+azM77gO5jliqAMsEFPeZOD9Zo2aZXjt8IVRYJtZ20acQ1x6 hAvuwLsNhcT1k2r3tkp0algFrsEKw9Lwb6qOBFZbZ4lHQyH9Pbc= =JmC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----