Re: Ballot option: Debian is created by humans

I sponsor the below ballot option. I think this is a useful distinction to
vote on that isn't already covered by the existing options.

Gard Spreemann <[email protected]> writes:

> ----- BEGIN BALLOT OPTION -----


> # Debian is created by humans


> ## Preamble

> This proposal aims to ensure that contributions directly to Debian are
> created by humans, while at the same time avoiding restrictions on the
> tools those humans may choose to use when contributing.

> The proposal deals with *direct* contributions to Debian, including, but
> not limited to:

> * Debian packaging
> * Submissions (messages, bug reports, patches, etc.) to the BTS, Salsa,
>   mailing lists and other Debian platforms 
> * Debian project software
> * Debian infrastructure
> * Debian web resources
> * Documentation and translation added as part of contributing to Debian
> * Official communication from Debian

> The proposal does not cover *indirect* contributions, i.e. those
> originating from upstream works.

> Generative AI is characterized by producing output of a nature that
> would ordinarily be produced and consumed by humans. The proposal seeks
> to restrict this output itself from entering Debian (except possibly
> indirectly, from upstream). It does not seek to restrict Debian
> contributors from consuming such output as part of contributing to
> Debian.


> ## Rationale

> Debian has a well-earned reputation for stability. This stability is
> crucial to its position in the free software ecosystem. It is our belief
> that a significant part of this stability comes from Debian contributors
> having mutual understanding, trust and respect for each others' work and
> precious time. Generative AI tends to come with practical, legal,
> ethical or ecological concerns that warrant care or extra work that
> often ends up being borne by people other than those wielding the AI. We
> believe that this asymmetry between contributors leveraging generative
> AI to produce material, and those humans who bear that extra care and
> work, will erode the project's mutual understanding, trust and respect.

> While Debian has a long-standing tradition of strict rules for what goes
> into the distribution, it does not typically dictate what tools people
> use when contributing to the project. With this principle in mind, the
> proposal does not affect the use of generative AI as an assisitive tool
> to explore, research, analyze, critique, etc., when contributing. The
> responsibilities that come with using the output of an AI in such a role
> is then not transferred onto the wider project in the same problematic
> way as when the output itself is the contribution.


> ## Proposal

> In order to safeguard the project's mutual understanding, trust and
> respect, we disallow the output of generative AI as direct contributions
> to Debian.

> Those who use such tools assistively in their work are reminded to
> ensure that the resulting contribution is in line with the DFSG and the
> Social Contract in general.

> In summary, humans create Debian.


> ## Acknowledgements

> This proposal is inspired by GCC's AI Policy [1] and rust-lang's LLM
> Usage Policy [2]. Its wording is influenced by another ballot
> option [3].

> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ai-policy.html

> [2] https://forge.rust-lang.org/policies/llm-usage.html

> [3] https://www.debian.org/vote/2026/vote_002#texta


> ----- END BALLOT OPTION -----

-- 
Russ Allbery ([email protected])              <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFDBAEBCgAtFiEE1zk0tJZ0z1zNmsJ4fYAxXFc23nUFAmp7ja0PHHJyYUBkZWJp
YW4ub3JnAAoJEH2AMVxXNt51S98H/2o3c7i+1Yuo43SMHx5I2S9rOCVHSiAWwUQh
9jSfDAQoBiHKgZFkueV99fCbb+y86DrIsCUKFsyifSn9SsKe4USZoBmCMl75spWO
hZXefAdBrGfc7RtmRsdzQp5SHVxI/CjQggq4/vaGHcsUtisAxXv92bU9SvsZn2BE
iSbaDULK9NMsvdYDYVhVi+O1O97LOMOLHGBhyhBOKhCZV/ibF4+izN6r24qjJ87e
m73dnD8iGGVsVe9wmxFnb3ailQR6eiHXDddfyQCcS5v3qh5jhRLIIkJsLJasIesp
vDXbUSF4fHr9dW+1v0IvLi4I6sl3STHqXjIH86A+GiPuMPx1gtw=
=W0Vd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----