Re: consensus on LLM usage

On 8/11/26 16:54, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 09:13:25PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
[…]
>> The discussion so far […] definitely didn't result in any sort of consensus IMHO.
> 
> agreed, i'm very very sure there won't be any consensus about LLM usage
> no matter how we'll vote.

NOTA (Non Of The Above) should already convey part of the statement that 
no consensus has been reached (or sought). Would a plea to No Further 
Discussion help (I don’t think so anymore, so much has already been 
imposed to all of us, asking for less may not reach the target)?

Cheers,

taffit