Re: Thoughts about LLM usage

Hi,

On 8/11/26 1:52 AM, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:

> Can you elaborate? Do you mean something like "having a small amount of 
> options means the collective understanding of the topic is good enough 
> to split the community into well defined groups"?

An ideal GR has two options, the consensus opinion and NOTA, and the 
vote is the formal step that recognizes that there is a consensus and 
makes that an official project position.

If we have multiple groups, then there is no consensus, and the choices 
are to either work together, or force a decision that creates "winners" 
and "losers."

In decreasing order of desirability:

1. consensus
2. working together
3. deciding vote
4. general unhappiness with the status quo

We are at 3 because 1 and 2 failed and people believe it is still better 
than 4.

    Simon