Re: Ballot option: Further Discussion
Mathias Gibbens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2026-08-12 at 22:30 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hi all, > > as different people can have different reasons to agree, I will not go > in further details. > > I propose a new ballot option with the following title and content. > > Title: Further Discussion > > Full text: Further Discussion Sorry, but isn't this exactly what "None of the above" is for? Let's not clutter an already full ballot with a redundant option. Mathias
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE1Bp60H32xfynSJ8cKe7i1uz0QvkFAmp8jT0ACgkQKe7i1uz0 Qvl8Nw//UJS0e2fXwJLPYGgLDGfh/hZbjOup2kPIBjT4glwLzVs7DIK3LoI98fad wcy36ov9CjB6CrzkuylGMLDGrV8RhLHd59lje0Hj44DtkgsKXvhT99qrFaK8tSQP rp8b3NhQRYBnKXzm0mmA4eDwyjYM6iuFKqo9BY5qAQfY670tGsWU45XTZSCmAEPL UcUaoyw3G0JyC1vrpeamllz6qnw9idunBikfEwweSf1b9QrMLAtG0tgnLfrIdyzN mOQwE/0JWOMflxwB8YspKdRgvj+z9sMxXDdypJNP4ThxLklR2eo8f3/4/V01sexr 5Fbf9z3utjE+JUanaL2VuQABXbODeao8oZ793Pr0BUO6J5GJIemFvlwGJZs0oQ9T jQKuVfeqYKaeeh6i1a/GVBO+yI4ITnGQ/s6OoRm6nBrx+Oy4fNeS/VimBcCpFomd GIq+U178ehs8tDRMadTM74o/M0V+IKPm+6fAxb1BGl8JxZ9LBgam75Iw6UX4I3xv kUQ3Mu5nTytiMUTUi9ijBuHHlCv9sntDus0wGLtUpR5P3HYAa9EZ5q2vgIx5Y0Lu G+wIsRjVfvy65vDHMJCYGOMdvWv26g6Ph2p8kdHgz3lazQQo1guULikzR36RtnHl b/SaESS+WapX+praadGn0Qte4LYGHMrbTQmiSIRZ1oip323drK8= =ByKY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----