Re: Ballot option: Further Discussion

Tobias Frost <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Seconded.

I think there should be an option to say "we are not ready yet to have a
decission", and I think this is distinct from NOtA.

--
tobi

On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 10:30:04PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> as different people can have different reasons to agree, I will not go
> in further details.
> 
> I propose a new ballot option with the following title and content.
> 
> Title: Further Discussion
> 
> Full text: Further Discussion
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Charles
> 
> -- 
> Charles Plessy                         Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
> Debian Med packaging team         http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
> Tooting from work,               https://fediscience.org/@charles_plessy
> Tooting from home,                 https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=LIKo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.