Re: Ballot option: Debian is created by humans
Gard Spreemann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marc Haber <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 12:40:07PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote: >>Could you explain a bit what the backstory here is, for those of us who >>haven't been around that long? > > https://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_003 > > Back in 2004, we voted on something that was harmlessly titled "Editorial > amendments to the social contract" and sounded like it would make very much > sense, clarifying things without making big changes ot the status quo. > > The GR had just two options and was given the nod with a 174:39 result. > > But it wasn't harmless at all. It extended the DFSG that applied to software > only before to everything that was part of Debian. Hours after the result was > published, people who value a non-running OS that is absolutely free more than a > pragmatic approach by keeping the software running opened bottles of champaign > and began efforts to get evil things like RFC texts and non-free firmware that > was already needed back then to run unimportant pieces of hardware like > mainstream Wifi interfaces from Deban proper. > > The resulting avalanche of suddenly RC-buggy packages delayed the release of > Debian sarge for about a year, caused huge friction inside the project and > brought us the non-free firmware discussion that negatively influenced our > software quality and ease of installation for 20 years before we finally started > making sense again. > > Ubuntu had its first release half a year after that GR and was able to pull a > significant number of our users away from us in the following years, due to > their running everywhere and us not releasing sarge. > > Since then, I always read all of the fine print of every GR that is proposed, > examining it carefully for hidden bombs like that one. This will also be the > reason why I will vote most of the ballot options below NOTA this time. > > Once bitten, twice shy. Thank you for this summary. I much appreciate it! Best, Gard
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 857 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJGBAEBCgAwFiEEz8XvhRCFHnNVtV6AnRFYKv1UjPoFAmp9tgwSHGdzcHJAbm9u ZW1wdHkub3JnAAoJEJ0RWCr9VIz6sEoP/1OAOvK5g/GKu4eYuIxprr9BVcXUJgfU ITEIa2qalDDGLy515obm6MB+sdyf6jTf9dqmRfCuBNM907vBY3kgDOzhFEFhWXXM 9zZhAallS74JjPvBL0KLIbQdKXZTCF5sM29np0RZZY5HAA2vjzpS1UVd8ls/APAS B6FjHNK7O78joKARuuZCaTBYgWl+uHjwiyj145KvvXdLhLudLkF2q/q4GfPdx+Pj RfCqGArkydr/2QbzUJrTIHUUyoZmRCzGp/huY5aJgljm4KkO7KQHRYAHYQSeMTGz WIU+h32+pXR+bxdfaj7b32MjBc2EAHdIe4KGBDORc47JfdtRBf8AkCUcgqe+A8FC dyw+PqSZ3aVxlK/WLiqmT/7+94omUZGzQ9/A/6s3nVjciIPh/FkdMqKfqYNjs0i9 35YE10GBKcayFAb+8/AvIE08R9Kja4pbpWKqoVEXxRHTCaLtDs4MCxouG0RrH7+d UTLWuY9hJG4x2soSUbp5ankS+690Fz+UJ97sgG4adxJ6AJZu2MgJraIIiQC4f7+2 CDKYTKF2e/e4Zdu7aDplkhlUsFY7g1kRvK/cYanaUa7XXqo0wPQF2OHJqlMbV1NE 1OvR/VQxkZ4EqSAGXa3A6SGJpgJ7+k8qbTOFt0YCeaK+y9+OZEJdio/ONWt0k2YT K2jG+CIYIVll =CGms -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----