Re: Number of options

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 06:15:36PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> So your take is that ignoring Kurt's email about devotee's support for
> votes with >9 options would contribute to building community?
> 
> (And no, I had no time to look at devotee manually, and I doubt that it
> would have triggered a lot of interest from others, given it only saw 11
> commits since 2017)

My take is that you keep ignoring people who repeatedly tell you that
using LLMs to contribute to this specific discussion feels
disrespectful to a significant part of its participants.

Kurt's problem is a different problem. My specific take there is that
Kurt shouldn't be left alone maintaining devotee.

The outcome of your LLM usage, that I can see, is that Kurt is left
alone maintaning devotee plus a new patch to integrate.

My growing feeling that LLM usage in Debian destroys community grows
with another data point.


Enrico

-- 
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <[email protected]>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEzcrDClsZDUbLiHVsQQj4QWUj0N4FAmp98KAACgkQQQj4QWUj
0N7hRg/+Nyk5oemXWeHucxIO+HZTsPrb35p56wGVAqbzDUydeVLoOKQ24Lki8cn2
B/upum6eE0PxTxA5f/8kVIkvxWAD1ZAR2wLyY7vzW9DoDoyaeZi1rWes7bKgUwug
zgKmw2Wv7mkbDaSST9NOeeEaRV8s0sNVsqbYaU8s7QZKhWQhzVVJu+FRdYINhyYx
8GdEWdE7SqdkHetxn7pGrFrmuBghu2Xjd7stcCj0lK7psjv4Q8tda0Afh4xnXbW3
3drcnhbYgu2e7zvNkNvYEYBjCqr3a/uRQAEouCbZVIi2+d/6A6B7dQuwgf4pGQET
Kwqb6I6XeJ4V2H3MIefniF+ERjuoQJnPPT02Wp1DcVJ9Ac81TJW0Q33qvhh3I1nF
CdKp5R38n7Q+c4LvIty4zEiEt4yiTaACAw1+O6baXlOSVjzLttVoE3lDXmP5yRNP
zcEceAkd/fYFUwr2iPOqV1G8lwy85BZRxuBQksewJFpDAVFCXPVDC32toYQYuU22
O6cHgg7iADAPo9EadDcuw5z6nZkD+zwDCNIe30uiPR35w9cGa5m2hO1bw1EVgPrK
yjSba9Pkn8xaBZMYwASwH0qtI1oYDrJvmyngDJhIyYYQQ5ZDxE+d6MuqZekluBKu
1GZSKrKDXfl2cabZl1i8AqL9K7C79KiU1srhDdLEEsVXEdF/4jo=
=H0V7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----