Re: Number of options

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 06:28:19PM -0500, Enrico Zini wrote:
> My take is that you keep ignoring people who repeatedly tell you that
> using LLMs to contribute to this specific discussion feels
> disrespectful to a significant part of its participants.

My take is the constantly changing, strident positions of people who
are anti-LLM (it's about environment!  even if it's not significant,
it's a position statement!  it's about copyright!  but it's even just
adding an unlock, if it comes from an LLM, it's evil and should be a
violation of the code of conduct, even if we can't tell if the
one-line change came from a human or not!, etc.) is similarly
disrespectful to the intelligence of the people in the debate.

It certainly has been frustrating.  Probably for everyone.

One way or another, it will be good once this GR is done, no matter
what the outcome will be.  At that point, we'll know whether the
people who are loudest in this debate are in the minority or not.

       	       	       	       	      	  - Ted