Re: Number of options

In general I've been impressed by the discourse in the GR
threads. I've been happily talking about that to people. But...

On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 12:48:37PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
>My take is the constantly changing, strident positions of people who
>are anti-LLM (it's about environment!  even if it's not significant,
>it's a position statement!  it's about copyright!  but it's even just
>adding an unlock, if it comes from an LLM, it's evil and should be a
>violation of the code of conduct, even if we can't tell if the
>one-line change came from a human or not!, etc.) is similarly
>disrespectful to the intelligence of the people in the debate.

You've multiple times belittled the reasonable and valid concerns that
a range of different people have expressed about LLM usage, and you're
*still* doing it. *Please* stop doing this, you know better.