Re: Ballot option: No Further Discussion
Soren Stoutner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <5694490.Sb9uPGUboI@soren-desktop> |
On Thursday, August 13, 2026 3:16:53 AM Mountain Standard Time David Prévot wrote: > Hi, > > If we add an option to discuss more on the subject, we probably should > be able to express that we don’t want that either. > > I propose a new ballot option with the following title and content. > > Title: No Further Discussion > > Full text: No Further Discussion You could create that option, but I do not know how it could be enforced without modifying the constitution (it would require a lot more text than you have above). As the constitution currently stands, there is nothing a GR can do that can prevent a future GR on the same subject. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmp+G68ACgkQwufLJ66w tgNPIw/5AUbhYf7jaV8wP/FcQAyWTLLyBWIPynEpZxxYNtyu5QeIDGBt29Hz0pF8 S3US7EUONJkinr9K77jrDbISUzrhHdQBOhptB5ox1quyx+dwYO/t4TRCkWt+52qV 7jgg6MxvFbkplcRrgf1YD7C8yM0UIGkOyPjAaP5Uz1y5ETqfL7BWoguhTHaOS9vw UylT8pi+1TOiZcDa1yfayeJU+29ShA1WJ8SwYwzpT0vXYZrGVC2K4rTFzVV7rEMU DytYtp6l2WaqleceX4uVOlm0EovbOfo6dRbEDVObDVSldLR73hIXIK3lR1VA1YZV GuHER6KvIRGuUwF8iqFx/ltdum5XSeCz5KoCSRHAHlI/ImRy3KhGJR+7V8ryBHg1 JjrCBmyEcdGjXJS2hNJbxZ6+v8lU3YvKfaj7zH2AMsMdJk4beZ7WCjzAi72S0mnD MBu2WYG8wlEfzl38ina7juGDNKtvcKbx7y8/PFmhVwvdQddifAYxryHFSRVFywzD 1vq4SMsPBam14MURxHQ30LZkfLzv7+RE2DVznd0xi//0Q5DmEctgkfye4dpIwgHf laHdruUhiAJ6nNcw084yYzAgkuUgU9kOgzbdjz1kJlMxRPKWDJQgsifqDhUv79u7 d9NA8lYJpe5ijHuCXT4S7cJUwnZ/uYOCuH4kPoZ1nmN6sjSuka4= =ifQv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----