Re: Number of options

Hi Andreas

On 2026/08/14 09:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I insist in the idea that we could perfectly go without a patch for
> devotee if we would first sit together and draft options that are easier
> to decide about.  As Antonio wrote before[1] we have
> 
>      a) ban LLM-assisted contributions completely
>      b) tolerate LLM-assisted contributions under a set of constraints.
> 
> I would prefer if we work on a sensible wording for those options first
> and vote about these afterwards.

I hate throwing a spanner in the works, but I tend to agree with the 
above and think that it might be a worth-while excercise to draft these 
two options, and see how much of the current options could be folded in 
to these options in a way that satisfies most people. Then if there's 
some nuance that really doesn't fit, it could be an additional option.

I know there are those who feel that further discussion is a burden, and 
those who even want to halt possibility of further discussion 
altogether, but whatever the result of the GR is, it's happening in a 
storm where the weather is most probably going to look a lot different 
in a year from now or even 5 years from now, so I hope that whatever the 
result of this particular GR, that people don't take a knee-jerk 
reaction to it and that we can continue to refine our position as the 
world around us changes.

-Jonathan