Re: Environmental impact of Debian's AI usage
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABpYwDUM=DFR8Ra6beY+nBw_xrCyQ3pdq-SnMs3RvK-qdguF5g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 at 21:40, Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> wrote: > And "Despite this, we again matched 100% of our electricity consumption > with renewable energy purchases (on a global and annual basis) for the > ninth consecutive year.". So they still *did* buy a green GWh for every GWh > they spent, just not on a per-second basis. That is how they calculate > emissions happening - they are using a *stricter* basis for their > calculations. > Sorry, I was wrong here. Page 69 actually details where the emission figure comes from. It is not from data center energy at all. They count *all* emissions from all sources connected to the company, including employees *commuting to work* and employee business travel. Just 1% of that came from Google operations. 19% are from secondary sources (like emissions caused by drawing electricity from grid at the time when not enough green energy is there). 80% of that number is from emissions by third-party suppliers. And Google still counts that as *their* emissions. I am not a fanboy for Google and not saying they are perfect, but one should also not pick out the numbers to present them worse than they actually are. -- Best regards, Aigars Mahinovs