Re: Environmental impact of Debian's AI usage

Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <CABpYwDUM=DFR8Ra6beY+nBw_xrCyQ3pdq-SnMs3RvK-qdguF5g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 at 21:40, Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> wrote:

> And "Despite this, we again matched 100% of our electricity consumption
> with renewable energy purchases (on a global and annual basis) for the
> ninth consecutive year.". So they still *did* buy a green GWh for every GWh
> they spent, just not on a per-second basis. That is how they calculate
> emissions happening - they are using a *stricter* basis for their
> calculations.
>

Sorry, I was wrong here. Page 69 actually details where the emission figure
comes from. It is not from data center energy at all. They count *all*
emissions from all sources connected to the company, including employees
*commuting to work* and employee business travel.  Just 1% of that came
from Google operations. 19% are from secondary sources (like emissions
caused by drawing electricity from grid at the time when not enough green
energy is there). 80% of that number is from emissions by third-party
suppliers. And Google still counts that as *their* emissions.

I am not a fanboy for Google and not saying they are perfect, but one
should also not pick out the numbers to present them worse than they
actually are.

-- 
Best regards,
    Aigars Mahinovs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.