Re: devotee (in)compatible signature
Matthias Urlichs <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 26.08.26 14:23, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: > gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir '/srv/vote.debian.org/data/gr_llm' > gpg: packet(2) with unknown version 5 > gpg: no signature found > gpg: the signature could not be verified. > [GNUPG:] NODATA 3[GNUPG:] NODATA 4 Bah. Don't we all hate the gnupg-vs-sq protocol version split … I wonder what would be involved in teaching sq to at least verify gnupg's v5 packets. Seems like an ideal task for an AI [SCNR]. -- -- regards -- -- Matthias Urlichs
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEr9eXgvO67AILKKGfcs+OXiW0wpMFAmqO/nUFAwAAAAAACgkQcs+OXiW0wpPi PRAA4JUS4R2I52vBmw2hsRKZuZVB9oPp0+9yNC6vtuhXLXw5uK/48WlJtiyw04h3MBOUyVmn6BOI YDuKLrL4UnbVkt1qGgYxFsFWivW4hXxLTQhOBcgKDlt+hsUqhnRQfcyoMXmJh7JC9F/OUDdIhL7X Lbj8twaBJ+eiJl2aQZE5yYQxO+4R4lDvIfNIxtG53xOM16q9r5VmDrHwGu6GCdxYZL23u53aVan7 0LEG5V7QNUxDOPmt6T4IwhfrPqVZr3POmvou0+FHkfhw402e0zENtELWKOqCAoghnnJ9GiXV4Wvh WlIBqL/Ay7LpQcvfklsJVH1eF/HOY9wZG3IV2W5a0SL5IuQUe65mGt1C1ST24EHGz8UkexOs4h6J PM0Z3kJ77/+UJYWVoelYhHyCwTYxW2Ni6kUb5j0BsEMvVmJCrZVsuv2GPk+Jw9vFNcZuTKfPDo0J bu27NCKG+7Cgkg/p84wZRTq6qZYYvG4/fKbkHWWv8sLlhUNYtffvv5qKdsOQV2+UP+VkDU6gVQX4 Lfch5dp6NeQ9Lb4/fQ4NCW5D8ThZ6WjfXOMVfrlv+IEFDnugLp73fsBM9N2Q74r8aeYilLa39aZb LbD6Aj9jbfrZS+Dh9TjmbuNY3I7fVPiqOmHoISeOB49M//iCUXeelUZvR4j26GllreqbDdGXnb3t 6mM= =fTDX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----