Bug#1142414: ITP: resources -- a simple yet powerful monitor for your system resources and processes
"Pieter Lenaerts" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:28:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.wnpp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DK9E0G2GW5VK.2OUPJVC3XT5C4__29256.852418051$1785158976$gmane$org@disroot.org> |
On Mon Jul 27, 2026 at 12:54 PM CEST, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 7:57 AM Pieter Lenaerts <[email protected]> wrote: >> Todo: look at autopkgtests & fix lintian reports. Wait for dependencies to >> reach unstable. > > We can upload to experimental now. > > I pushed a few more commits. Thanks Jeremy. I relaxed the dependency on rmp-serde again to >= 1.3.0 since 1.3.1 is not available yet in any repo. I added a thx to the changelog. I feel it's right. I set the distribution in the changelog to experimental, but I have no upload rights. Not sure if you want to upload or want to give me upload rights on this package already. I was going to enable salsa-ci, but I see I can't enable it in the salsa project. Will you do the necessary? What should we do with the sub crate process_data? 1) Should it be a separate package or is all fine if we build like this? 2) I'm also wondering if disabling the process_data tests is fine? But then again, if the resources tests pass, then ... I guess that's what we need? What do you think? Br, Pieter
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 256 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIkEABYKADEWIQQrLg4/tS9aUxZMq8oFuPKwcqDg6wUCamdc6RMccGxlbmFlQGRp c3Jvb3Qub3JnAAoJEAW48rByoODrlfABALxI0SWehQj8WCPok//mnnKTFuO+FSZ9 szhenlcTwh02AQD3Xu1LNdSFNIAFuzIxBrVFidtkYTtZG1q7Z1sR9kc8Bw== =cqRq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----