Bug#780518: [Website] translations of Debian Constitution

Hi,

Paul Wise <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Holger Wansing wrote:
> 
> > It came to my mind if it would be legally correct, to mark translaions of
> > the Debian Constitution as translations and therefore as not legally valid?
> 
> The Debian Project is not a legal entity and the Debian Constitution
> is not a legal document, just a set of rules the Debian Project
> governs itself by.
> 
> I think it is reasonable to have the constitution translated, as long
> as out-of-date translations are clearly marked. Currently they are not
> marked properly. I expect the outdatedness feature of the website
> needs to be adjusted to allow for per-page age preferences.

Today it came to my notice, that adding a line like

#use wml::debian::translation-check translation="1.xxx" mindelta="1" maxdelta="1"

would do the job.

Shall I add that to the translations? (there are still some outdated ones ATM).
I think it wouldn't hurt...


Holger

-- 
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
	D E B I A N   L I N U X   7 . 0   W H E E Z Y !

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================