Bug#721215: Please mention Debian Administrator's Manual in the main list of documentation

Osamu Aoki <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <20150610131726.GA8083__3178.82076274163$1433942500$gmane$org@goofy.local>
Hi,

Very quick :-)

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:38:35PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi Osamu,
> 
> thanks for the cc.
> 
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > On the other side, I'm not sure if "user manuals" is for the
> > > documentation maintained by the Debian Documentation Project (and then,
> > > the Handbook shouldn't be there, even if there is a package available,
> > > several translations, and it's DFSG-free).
> > 
> > "Debian Documentation Project" is very loose organization.  Whoever made
> > any useful DFSG documentation as DD (or DD wannabe) are the member.
> > 
> > Raphaël Hertzog and Roland Mas are DDs and sure they can be a member if
> > they wish.
> 
> Strictly speaking I am a member of the associated Unix group... due to my
> work on developers-reference at that time. But I agree with you that the
> team is very loosely defined and it doesn't make much sense to restrict
> that page in any such way.
> 
> > If we wish to publish this on our www.debian.org/doc/ site, all I have
> > to do is add the debian-handbook to the list of documentation published
> > via cron script
> >  git clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/debwww/cron.git
> >  specifically parts/7docs
> > 
> > This unpacks packages and publishes them on our www.debian.org/doc/ site.
> 
> I would prefer if we could keep a simple reference to the main site that I
> maintain instead of hosting a full copy of it because as you noted the
> version hosted on my website includes a link towards a download page where
> readers can also donate. And it's also more regularly updated than the
> package (in particular for translations). You can still provide
> individuals links for each translation and possibly also links to the
> different formats available...

www.debian.org/doc/ "Quick start"
These are direct link to the document itself on the Debian server.
So this is not for "The Debian Administrator's Handbook"

www.debian.org/doc/ "Manuals specific to Debian - Users' manuals"
These are list of actively maintained documentations with indirect link
via https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals pages. There we can list
package or web-page or remote links.  Since "The Debian Administrator's
Handbook" has package in archive, listing it in
https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals page for its package and remote
link to URL: http://debian-handbook.info is OK.

The text "There are also several user-oriented manuals written for
Debian GNU/Linux, available as printed books." is too weak in the
www.debian.org/doc/ page.  Adding some title there may be good idea to
point people to https://www.debian.org/doc/books.en.html

> But I fully agree that useful documentation should be listed in /doc/ even
> when it has not been produced under the "Debian Doc" umbrella. That team
> has always been a loosely defined team and most of the documents tend to
> have dedicated maintainers with relatively few overlap between all the
> documents.
> 
> So IMO we should find a way to include links in that page. What matters is
> to make useful DFSG-free content available to our users.

Yah, "DFSG" is the good requirement for listing around DDP related pages.

What do you think about my plan described in the above.

I do not see any conflict of interest for apt-doc aptitude-doc-* and
debian-kernel-handbook.  So I will be adding them and publishing their
contents on www.debian.org, eventually.

Osamu
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.