Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

Alex Vong <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <CADrxHD_bKHiXexNALxby-9=YTzbDXe3ZHTgkbr=Ay3sZpSoT9A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

Indeed, RHEL is FOSS and commercial at the same time. How do the others think?

Cheers,
Alex

On 26/10/2015, Mehrdad Linux <[email protected]> wrote:
> hi
>
> in page What Does Free Mean? <https://www.debian.org/intro/free.en.html>
> in paragraph 6 part 3
>
> write
>
> Distribution of source code. One of the problems with most commercial code
> is that you can't fix bugs or customize it since the source code is not
> available. Also, the company may decide to stop supporting the hardware you
> use. Many free licenses force the distribution of the source code. This
> protects the user by allowing them to customize the software for their
> needs.
>
>
> i can not find any source about commercial code i know freesoftware
> can be Commercial
> software but what is the commercial code?
>
>
>  i check wikipedia  <javascript:void(0)> but still have problem
>
> i think if we write  proprietary software it is beter
>
> thanks
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.