Re: commercial code Vs Commercial software

really thanks

end   of article write

To report a problem with the web site, e-mail [email protected].

and you are only person answer me

how can i report a bug ?
thanks  :D

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Alex Vong <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes, I think it is a bug. Have you already sent a bug report? If not,
> I will send it when I have time. (Maybe on weekend)
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
> On 28/10/2015, Mehrdad Linux <[email protected]> wrote:
> > OK it is very good thanks
> >
> > 1 :  you accepted free software can be commercial software
> > 2 :  you seed commercial code is code of commercial software
> > 3 :  free software is kind of software have  Four Freedoms
> > (run,study,redistribute,improve)
> >
> > OK
> >
> > look at this link
> >
> > in Debian web site
> > https://www.Debian.org/intro/free.en.html
> >
> > we have article titled
> > What Does Free Mean? or What do you mean by Free Software?
> >
> > in paragraph 6 part 3
> >
> > write
> > "
> >
> >> Distribution of source code. One of the problems with most commercial
> >> code
> >> is that you can't fix bugs or customize it since the source code is not
> >> available. Also, the company may decide to stop supporting the hardware
> >> you
> >> use. Many free licenses force the distribution of the source code. This
> >> protects the user by allowing them to customize the software for their
> >> needs.
> >>
> > "
> >
> > i think it must be fix it is wrong  “free software” is a matter of
> liberty,
> > not price
> >
> > why it write commercial code is that you can't fix bugs?
> > why it write source code is not available?
> >
> > i thinks it must be fix and it is wrong
> >
> >
> > thanks for your  answers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Alex Vong <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I see what you mean now, thanks for clarification! IMO, commercial
> >> code is simply code of commercial software. Free code and proprietary
> >> code can be defined similarly as well. I am showing an counter example
> >> that RHEL is "made up" of commercial code but is free software at the
> >> same time. Does this answer your question?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> On 27/10/2015, Mehrdad Linux <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > thanks for your answer
> >> > maybe you don't read my email :D
> >> > look at title
> >> > read this paragraph carefully
> >> >
> >> >  Distribution of source code. One of the problems with most commercial
> >> code
> >> > is that you can't fix bugs or customize it since the source code is
> not
> >> > available. Also, the company may decide to stop supporting the
> hardware
> >> you
> >> > use. Many free licenses force the distribution of the source code.
> This
> >> > protects the user by allowing them to customize the software for their
> >> > needs.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > RHEL source code are available and you can fix the bug and .....
> >> >
> >> > i know free software can be Commercial software but what is the
> >> commercial
> >> > code?
> >> >
> >> > why commercial code can't fix bugs or customize it since the source
> >> > code
> >> is
> >> > not available
> >> >
> >> > my question is what is difference between
> >> > 1 : commercial code
> >> > 2 : Commercial software
> >> > 3 : proprietary software
> >> >
> >> > i know difference of Commercial software proprietary software my
> >> > question
> >> > is what is commercial code?
> >> >
> >>
> >
>