Re: LDP still relevant?

Laura Arjona Reina <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Tom
 On 1 de mayo de 2016 16:55:54 GMT+02:00, Tom M <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The Linux Documentation Project [1] is mentioned in Debian's docs,
>often as the
>only source of general GNU/Linux docs. As far as I can see, it is
>largely an
>outdated resource; floppy disks are regularly mentioned, there are
>links to
>software tarballs, etc. In fact, none of the "most popular Linux
>documents
>and manuals" [2] have seen updates in the last 13 years, some as many
>as 20.
>(And they are 2 clicks from the front page!) I don't think we are doing
>anyone
>a favour by mentioning these, and should consider other sources.
>
>Previously I posted to debian-doc and was told to post a bug report,
>but I
>can't find the tracker for the website.

Thanks for caring about the Debian website.
Please file a bug against the "www.debian.org" package:

 http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

Ideally we should provide new references replacing the obsolete ones; if you have any suggestion please include them in the bug report.

Thanks
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.