Bug#819664: .sign suffix?

Eduard Bloch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <20160926215732.mkbsrfvwquvbldqr__21321.8241850429$1474927241$gmane$org@rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de>
Hallo,
* Steve McIntyre [Mon, Sep 26 2016, 03:14:21PM]:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:10:37AM +0200, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Le 25/09/2016 à 17:57, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> >> I am slightly wondering about this new filename ending .sign. IMHO the
> >> usual pattern for such files was .gpg before (for example: Release.gpg).
> >> 
> >> This .sign looks weird, it does not tell you which format the data
> >> inside might have.
> >
> >Can you provide an example where the extension has changed?
> >
> >There are signatures ending with .sign for each cd, dvd, etc. images but
> >the suffix seems to be always .sign since release 3.1:
> >http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r0/i386/iso-cd/
> >
> >it's like today:
> >http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/8.6.0/amd64/iso-cd/
> >
> >The scheme is
> >{MD5, SHAx}SUMS : the checksum according to each algorithm
> >{MD5, SHAx}SUMS.sign : the checksum signed by a Debian CD signing key
> 
> Exactly - we've been using the .sign filenames for many years for CD
> releases.

Uhm, ok, sorry, please forgive my failure to research.

Best regards,
Eduard.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.