Bug#859122: about 500 DLAs missing from the website

Antoine Beaupre <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <149088372568.22144.197345294156985604.reportbug__28131.262647412$1490884046$gmane$org@curie.anarc.at>
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi!

First, thanks for doing the work of importing DLAs and DSAs in the
website, it is greatly appreciated.

However, during a discussion on the debian-lts@ mailing list, we have
noticed that DLAs since squeeze LTS support was terminated have not
been imported:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2017/03/msg00205.html

An excerpt from the discussion:

> Here's the bits that are missing:
> 
>  * the last DLA on the website is DLA-445-2, which is basically the last
>    DLA before squeeze support ended and wheezy was handed over
> 
>  * among those 445 DLAs, there are actually 31 missing:
> 
>    webwml$ cd english/security/; find -name 'dla-*.wml' | wc -l
>    424
> 
>  * even worse, it seems there are at least 20 advisories missing from
>    the website because regression uploads hide advisories, because our
>    naming convention differs from DSA ("DLA-XXX-N", where XXX is the
>    original advisory and N are regression updates)
> 
>    $ grep DLA- data/DLA/list | sed 's/.* DLA-//;s/ .*//' | sort -n | sed '/445-2/,$d' | wc -l
>    465
> 
>  * the canonical list has 928 advisories:
> 
>    secure-testing$ grep DLA- data/DLA/list | wc -l 
>    928

Is there any reason why new DLAs have not been imported?

Is there anything we can do to help in completing that import?

I will open a separate ticket regarding possible automation shortly.

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: armhf

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.