Questions prompted by {Re: (no) link to release notes for testing/stretch}
Richard Owlett <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/18/2017 09:51 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Selim T. Erdoğan wrote: > >> It would be very helpful for >> https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/ >> to have a link to >> https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes >> and for > > The template for in-progress releases includes a commented-out > paragraph with a link to the release notes: > > # <p>There is a <a href="releasenotes">draft of the release notes available</a>. > # Please also <a href="https://bugs.debian.org/release-notes">check the > # proposed additions to the release notes</a>.</p> > > I've changed the wording a little and enabled it for when suites are testing: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/releases/stretch/index.wml?view=log > > This will be online in a few hours. > >> https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/ >> to have a link to >> https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/releasenotes > > This happens automatically when a new stable release is made but my > above changes are to the stretch page. > This is the first time I've had reason to use a release still designated as "testing". [In the past I've had bandwidth constraints limiting me to purchased DVD sets.] 1. At _this point_ in the release cycle is there reason to prefer URLs specifying "stretch" over ones with "testing"? 2. Is there a document (or blog or ??) targeted at someone using a "testing" release for the first time. My interest relates to the move from MySQL to Mariadb - I've already been pointed to links to the fine details of the change. I'm asking if there something with a broad perspective on dealing with any testing release. TIA