Bug#871659: www.debian.org: scripts: Debian GNU/Linux FAQ should not be typesetted on webserver but webserver should use faq .deb (was: Re: [...] Debian Documentation BoF @ DebConf17 [...])

Joost van Baal-Ilić <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <20170811155215.GA11325__39974.6838993908$1502467218$gmane$org@beskar.mdcc.cx>
Hi Javier,

Do you agree the FAQ could better be typesetted from the .deb?  Or am I missing
something here?  (I've had a chat with David Prévot about this bug, he
mentioned you were involved in setting this all up and had some insight in it.)

Bye,

Joost

PS/Note to self: involved scripts:
git/debwww/cron/parts/7doc
git/debwww/cron/parts/7doc_manuals
svn/debian/manuals/trunk/Makefile

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 03:47:13PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Previous, in
> https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[email protected] :
> 
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:06:54PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:36:42PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 06:38:51PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:06:40PM +0200, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> <snip>
> > > > >  We'll be discussing the state of Debian's Documentation, what we would
> > > > >  like it to be (the Arch wiki?), and how to get there.
> > > <snip> 
> > > The BoF was not video-d
> <snip>
> > > Here's the "slides", and, more importantly, some notes/conclusions reached.
> > > 
> > >           Debian Documentation BoF
> > >                     by
> > >         you and Joost van Baal-Ilić
> <snip>
> > >       DebConf17, Montréal, august 2017
> <snip>
> > > Notes taken during the discussion
> > > - faq should not be typesetted at webserver; website should use .deb of faq
> <snip>
> 
> The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ, as publised at
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ , is one of the very few of our
> documents which gets fetched from VC and build/typesetted by the webserver;
> most other documents use the content as shipped by the document's .deb
> packages.  The latter scheme is better since it saves resource usage on our
> webserver.  We loose frequent updates of the web-published content.  However,
> the source content of our documents is no longer updated very frequently
> anyway, so I feel we're ready for using the .deb.
> 
> I plan to fix this bug myself.  Note to self: hack on
> ssh://git.debian.org/git/debwww/cron.git (Thanks Osamu Aoki.)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.