Re: Bittorent Download Errors - Debian 9.2.1

Stan Lubiak <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Those were the only errors reported. I downloaded 9.2.0 after I got the 9.2.1 errors. Vuse+/BitDefender did not report any errors with that download. I have not yet performed an install, only a download.

FYI, The following is from the Vuse+ website:
Every hour of every day, BitDefender updates its virus database with the latest protection against viruses, scams and malware. Then every time you download a new file with Vuze Plus, its built-in BitDefender protection first checks to make sure it has downloaded new definitions within the last four hours.
"Unable to scan" - there are a number of reasons that a file may fail to scan. Usually it is related to having moved a file from its default download location while it is still in your Vuze Library. Vuze can no longer locate the file, so it cannot scan it for malware.

I did not do anything differently for the 9.2.0 vs 9.2.1 downloads, & did not move, modify, or perform any other actions on the downloaded files. Plus, the two .tar files are contained within the .iso.

~Stan

> On Oct 20, 2017, at 1:21 PM, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:01:25PM -0700, Stan Lubiak wrote:
>> I don’t know. This is the first time I’ve ever seen this alert.
>> 
>> Vuse+ automatically scans all downloads with a built-in BitDefender engine. 
> 
> Were there any other errors, or just:
> 
>>>>  Result: ARCHIVE /Users/Shared/Public/Downloads/Vuze Downloads/
>>>>  debian-9.2.1-amd64-xfce-CD-1.iso
>>>> 
>>>>    CORRUPTED xmethods.tar
>>>> 
>>>>    CORRUPTED schema.tar
> 
> ? Searching on my local system, the only mention I can see for those
> filenames in Stretch are gzip-compressed versions in the
> python-wstools package, and that hasn't changed between 9.2.0 and
> 9.2.1. No packages did - the difference was just the ordering of
> packages.
> 
> I'm curious - when did you download 9.2.0 via torrent? Does it *still*
> work for you now? Maybe there's been a coincidental change in the
> signatures your virus checker is using.
> 
> -- 
> Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                [email protected]
> "Yes, of course duct tape works in a near-vacuum. Duct tape works
> anywhere. Duct tape is magic and should be worshipped."
>   -― Andy Weir, "The Martian"
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.