Re: Cryptic website (scares away potential users)

Paul Wise <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <CAKTje6GhHAgwghkajWrsW=bfjdiYGc6WH0oi+HxS8owgKL8S=w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:

> I think it would be nice to have this list or a sentence explaining
> amd64 is probably the right choice:
>
> "For current desktops and laptops, amd64 is the right architecture."

Looks good, I'd also suggest the qualifier "most" and mentioning servers:

"For most current laptops, desktops and servers, amd64 is the right
architecture."

> I wonder where is a best place to insert it.

Anywhere there is a list of architectures that could confuse people,
so it should probably be put in a template and included on each
relevant page.

> In we insert the list, I think 'server' and 'old server' should include
> an approximate date (2000?). However, people using sparc64 (ou itanium,
> etc.) knows they have an uncommon architecture. So, in my opinion, the
> more important is to provide an hint for amd64 users.

Year ranges would be appropriate indeed.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.