Re: Cryptic website (scares away potential users)
Stéphane Blondon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 09/11/2017 à 07:28, Paul Wise a écrit : > Looks good, I'd also suggest the qualifier "most" and mentioning servers: > > "For most current laptops, desktops and servers, amd64 is the right > architecture." I think about inserting it in https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/index.en.html because it's the page where Henrik was blocked. >> In we insert the list, I think 'server' and 'old server' should include >> an approximate date (2000?). However, people using sparc64 (ou itanium, >> etc.) knows they have an uncommon architecture. So, in my opinion, the >> more important is to provide an hint for amd64 users. > > Year ranges would be appropriate indeed. Inserting the list in the page will probably less useful. Perhaps we could add it in the FAQ? When a new version of the FAQ will be online, we can make a 'more info about architecture' link to the Q&A in the FAQ after the sentence. I plan to do these two steps in few days if no one has a better solution. -- Stéphane
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEFXRbhjtX1pKPhY7rorkbxs1OvdwFAlogg1gACgkQorkbxs1O vdwY5g//VBAZFnjBHg14f3c/wy1eq5uRnZzoohXDB2VjfQgNxVVYLpFgOXX3MnNY rPB2o3hppenheum3GcXJ9NIrjnj9aNSSzTk8EieAZr9yS3nsiRRWmkiZPfQr+JEk kCN9ZP54gxIGbl1PFb8sjo6SnRP60mJ6v3kU33NnmVg5naj6JGr98DPqfsnSZWQ1 lK0FO7Z4GXEbGG/vZzaVOzUk7QZbWzjGbIrBXBHSHuOnEF+RzhQjxb8p+6gFqrhF osPFmymLmCoDDfvg4x8G501jN8gPTg4EsugSEiHF8EVljZiY1NT50Lzl92FqTyZc VHNUnZahYq5pz5hS0lVv1evPxjm53LlrLfAi1wHHrTq5gKzhsaQACFVwAtpUCWgX o6rNtqaugv9uhcxaNKVGFkNDI2ujkBWUOXfFPII0V10wo5RHEXKQRsVrJ86QYrAq fW3GNULcc6ukYkmurGLpH9JxS3XnxigCyLg6gFMs8pawAYJsastzTWuYxIb+x4dA Yf7jyHfYa3eNEAKH0eUh9q8qTpWpR+85nWYA07iz00JhVs/mp3h0p4Rv2/8qx8OH hQG0PCzsajAKNYziL1Z1cjH7eIpzItpp4DQyvFR5rhyNfxN5lRlgqz5klxrY1GgF wAUSyqMAPuU541cQRf63Tfaek9zTs7vQH5YMEk2AaiMNL/x2w5c= =SuFN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----