Re: about 500 DLAs missing from the website

Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www,gmane.linux.debian.devel.lts
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Antoine,

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:08:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Thanks for working on this.

indeed!

> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:44:10PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On 2018-12-19 18:05:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > > The DLAs are visible here:
> > > https://www-staging.debian.org/security/2018/dla-1580

that one is also visible on
https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dla-1580 now \o/

> > > One thing that's unclear is how the entries get added to the main list
> > > in:
> > > https://www-staging.debian.org/security/2018/
> IMHO they should not be mixed into the same namespace as the DSAs.
> https://www.debian.org/security/ is very specific to the
> debian-security-announce list and contains items for e.g. contacting
> the Debian security team or referecing the respective FAQ.
 
I agree.

(Thus I think
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/50 should
be cloded and not merged.)

OTOH I plan to review
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/53 once
more and then merge it.)

> I think having a dedicated https://www.debian.org/lts/ where those can
> be collected and having further information on LTS would be somehow
> better.

Yup.

> This will need an adjustment to the tracker side as well so that
> sources filed for Debian LTS DLA's will not link to
> https://www.debian.org/security/$year/dla-$nr .

*nods*

> If a dedicated subpage is not needed and the only purpose is to link
> to a webversion, and the DLA's do not show up in the overall view then
> possibly the status quo is still okay.

I think it's ok for now / the current situation is an improvement over
what we had before, but we really want/need one a dedicated page like
https://www.debian.org/lts/ too.


On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:38:02PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Note that we already have some DLAs published in
> www.debian.org/security/YYYY, for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016. See
> for
> example:
> 
> https://www.debian.org/security/2014/index
> 
> I don't mind to move the already published DLAs to other place if
> people
> decides it's better, but I frankly don't know if/where these URLs are
> used/publicised (in Debian and maybe other places too), and we may
> need
> to setup redirectors from the current URLs to the new ones (no problem
> with that, I say it only to not forget, in case we decide to move all
> the DLAs to a different place).

right. we should do that and probably track this with a bug...


-- 
tschau,
	Holger

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bOsr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.