Re: Intent to upload new WML version to unstable for buster

Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Organization Debian
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Axel,

Axel Beckert <[email protected]> (2018-12-25):
> wml package maintainer here.
> 
> For multiple Debian releases I've kept newer WML releases in
> experimental as they crashed rather often with my own WML based
> projects.
> 
> I recently uploaded 2.10.1 to experimental which seems to work
> identical to 2.0.12. I just had to include a few patches for making
> wmk and some corner cases work properly again. And with them works
> well on my own projects as well as with webwml (tried English, German
> and Japanese).
> 
> All were built without glitches and english took nearly an hour to
> complete on my laptop, but did complete without a single non-zero exit
> code.
> 
> With the exception of a bunch of CSS paths deeper down, the website
> generated with it looks fine to me.
> 
> So I intent to upload the just released version 2.12.0 (which
> incorporates all the fixes I had to put into the Debian package) to
> unstable before New Year's eve.
> 
> I'd be happy if someone else could also do some checks to ensure the
> WWW team won't have too many headaches when www.debian.org (or
> whereever the pages are actually built) gets upgraded to buster.

Thanks for the heads-up.

I've filed a bunch of bug reports against www.debian.org according to my
findings, a lot of them being about leftovers or various things related
to the build system. Changes likely linked to the wml update are in the
last bug report:

    #924135: clean-up: old .cvsignore files
    #924136: README: mention at least make
    #924137: www.debian.org: debian.org metapackage: add python python-lxml
    #924139: www.debian.org: migrate from python to python3
    #924140: README: please mention STRICT_ERROR_CHECKS=1 USE_SAMPLE_FILES=1
    #924143: www.debian.org: debian.org metapackage: add dependency for Locale::Codes
    #924144: www.debian.org: debian.org metapackage: missing libgd-perl dependency
    #924146: www.debian.org: possible leftover: norwegian/Bugs/pseudo-packages.inc
    #924172: www.debian.org: differences under english/ between builds in stretch and buster

Now looking at making it easier to compare a full build instead of just
a single directory.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois ([email protected])            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAlyEaQYACgkQ/5FK8MKz
VSCVgg//ZYJr7NsRlcLxBVZWK+WMPJ6hFuRlgmDLh4CZi/dX2hGKoHPNNLV2yZko
E3M9LpsQDw2FnITBd15xcIjlY5Zc33d2aMOQKBvbVDkXAC9ybKucHvtwYm4XG2di
GwihDndAExbzav5tvDRGSBAXgFsK4O4B8fdK7fKouYzcH5AOs/wJRU76tOffz3Lk
3T6FOQtberEu3DkVc2AwmpN2D+EztuFo4InVA7R9yUBpR/DpeI4TS0wvqyVL9ZaS
mNz8zYtC6WE+EP10VWa8Kw4YmPETY5sb2dY9RviUN5MZrMptcGrzg6EW0Pksi7Rc
tZ2Q7XIb6XNq99ZqyKFSAXSlWisQ7IWp3GeYqhcTqNqMJOAL4dozSikUveGLhgpk
6RTwWqlGSGqT3lBnh01DDiMF89UraMUneFQLbJPwei3N7Mzc+Xhe5xpxy6Tvunz2
KSZYMfIWTjT1yvu3dQ5L7Zb6crzMulAN4/IJiLYVIm0Jakeg9/UfyqwGSnKNLAnY
vhpJyDs3Ku9ZtejKv31hYJJKSb0l8zMaBnouwgiqLWBluAX5VQn2QXHIned0ljQY
nhQgVYEA3cbYR7QzGwzihkkZrI0tSIM0HG2242Pl64PWMS3cIpU3XUjkQNcKoDla
1KnDkEJNp22rBtXOU5buU6EVrWBfBHvefcEYrXKldASsd7d1jCM=
=/s/7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.