Bug#147164: ping and new proposal
Andrei POPESCU <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20190409062707.tr5hcbtpbudd4f2g__8811.22992593504$1554791424$gmane$org@pine64> |
On Lu, 08 apr 19, 16:06:11, Thomas Lange wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:54:21 +0300, Andrei POPESCU <[email protected]> said: > > I would suggest this should read "Every document must have at least one > > active maintainer" (regardless of what the Maintainer: field contains). > So you mean the usual Debian package maintainer? Then we do not need > to mention this explicitly, but better say that every manual should > be also a Debian package. Are there manuals which are not in Debian > package? What I meant was that every document should be actively maintained (content wise). Whether it's packaged is an implementation detail (in my opinion not even a requirement), so it doesn't really matter what the Maintainer: field says. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE5E64jOIbhY42OXqk/8eFRO8iNBwFAlysOzsACgkQ/8eFRO8i NBzqQA/9GronR+kslUeO2kq1HxPQNBh/cjPOdx0Q6NIGzZl8nZIvGhQzwVAZ1qHz 8cyrnfbb98CXMyw8ZFwliUJd8mecYlrW/zzFWy/kY4l3/1Sr84gTnpXG5ZtPnM1r McxXtWHvVhgIflVS1KcVw3UICbUO8pcPnPLGHMH7frpE2K+A0qmfAywII8OhhRzO qrVPOggXBJ+witXXCJEa2fZr4UCGwHHT83U9HilBTfSab4XE+wgpQP7UoOhSs7oK wMcou9NftKYFQNAiW/vplAUyIAl1oZlalhbUj+GTwv6xdokBgp1hanvRgmngjVxy /vFYWV7WX+MJvwbwLy2J/fcPVI8o1JNnc4SQeC+nfEakqxBa03TXH6iCq76FscA7 mgIx6OLYkdccfB/3Du0UbQ3An2KUtMQPfnwNaPhIAzHznhaU792ODd78tqWkV804 DbFwdgrE0SSqP+iqAR7yEYiaI751YpWoz7z6ktAYMU8a8SYARcbRFJKgqj4j3V1y pOUY30mxv2lot4S9U/m+O+Ddm5wJ3ps5mmuEX4kfer84kwwBXLKbawusK4jwYIuq 6zhQLe5ZXn+Nj+kaelPe2BGlM/r7Pq3H2A5/tgyWjrZe9CPgluLBOwLgFRj8mHjb L1IQmFuA9ppimV7iB0qrlYaKm3ncPihjMVtHP9vIoMLDutQol5Y= =pUs3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----