Re: Request for write access to webwml repository

Holger Wansing <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Carsten Schoenert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Fabian,
> 
> Am 24.12.20 um 13:25 schrieb Fabian Baumanis:
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > I'm translating the Debian website into German and I would like to 
> > request write access to the webwml repository.
> > 
> > The current workflow is a bit of a pain because I'm working on the 
> > outdated translations, which means that I'm just editing 2-3 lines in 
> > the page source code. Then I have to send the MR to another member who 
> > has write access, to have the MR merged.
> 
> why is that a pain? It's more the usual way in my eyes.
> It's not that write access can not be given, but there is a lot of trust
> needed to give contributors full write access.
> 
> So why not start as every contribution is typically starting? In the old
> days a patch set was needed to send to a list, this isn't needed as
> creating MRs on Salsa is really easy and cheap.
> If you can contribute at a high level we can grant write access to the
> webwml repo later.
> 
> Even previous Debian project leaders doing MR for updating the Debian
> website.
> 
> > We currently have 80-90 pages with outdated translations so this would 
> > create a big overhead and I don't want to disturb the other members in 
> > their work. If therer would be any bigger changes in a MR, I would 
> > request a review on our mailing list of course.
> 
> I see no problem if you start your work within your own namespace and
> create various MRs. The typical review can be done at any time.

I want to second Fabian's request for write access.
Moreover, I have suggested him to write that mail to debian-www.

He has already contributed some translation work for German website, and it
would be a great benefit for German, if he would update all those outdated
files.

Regarding merge requests: 
for me the technique via MR might be sensible for some work, but I also see
some contra points, as Fabian said.
I think I can say, that I'm familiar with working with git commandline tools.
But nevertheless I often have problems understanding how things work via the
graphical Salsa interface.
I might be easy, if you know how it works, or if you have someone explaining
it to you site-by-site. But if you are forced to learn it completely by 
yourself via reading the docs and try-and-error, it's often a pain IMHO.

Also, you can find countless merge requests rotting on Salsa, with noone
taking action for them. That does not give a nice impression to new contributors
or interested people IMO.

This is just my opinion, not necessarily Fabian's.

At the end, I agree with Fabian, that direct write access would ease his
work (and the work of the whole team in summary) a lot.
I'm sure, Fabian will accept the poliy to only commit changes to the
../German subdirectory, but no other subdirs.
(In fact, that is exactly what he intends to do!)
If it helps, I volunteer for reviewing his commits, to make sure they are ok.



Holger
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.