Re: Using urlcheck - how many broken links should we accept?
Paul Wise <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKTje6FEtwa+fJysyL08RyuFKFhnZLwtiE6ZZRy18OxUXBEVig@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:15 PM Thomas Lange wrote: > Sometimes people replace a broken link with a working link to > archive.org. I do not like that. I prefer removing broken links. And > often the content is also outdated, and removing it may be adequate. For historical pages (like old News pages, old elections or votes), I think it is better to either leave the broken links as-is or use archive.org for the broken links than to remove those historical pages/links from the website.