Bug#1010475: wiki.debian.org: wrong link to libreoffice-kf5
Felipe Maia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <lwMIg8_3-u69ioh0k9fCvXsykc7lmYQnyrKjStk5RhkhtiK-K9RKbbBb2NFfc0spojNZNhvCvLVhlZ31PRf-shIfArbt6pV40F0Rju34f0w=__17984.0353129961$1651631428$gmane$org@protonmail.com> |
On Tuesday, May 3rd, 2022 at 8:50 PM, Paul Wise <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 22:19 +0000, Felipe Maia wrote: > > > Time to close the bug. Please verify if the following pseudo-header > > is correct: > > ... > > > Comment: Fixes "Bug#1010475: wiki.debian.org: wrong link to > > > libreoffice-kf5". Typo "libreoiffice-kf5" corrected to > > > "libreoffice-kf5". > > Yes, except you don't need to include the edit Comment really, > since the edit itself preserves the comment and the Version > refers to the edit via the number and link. > > > I'm not sure if the information I included as "Version" should have > > been included as "Comment" instead. > > I think that the Version you used is fine, although > I would have just used the link for the Version myself. Do you mind writing the entire pseudo-header? I think it would be better to understand exactly what you're recommending. I'll then compare to the pseudo-header I wrote. > > Just realized the mistake I made changing the category of the Wiki page. Paul reverted the change. Thanks Paul! I thought the category was related to the editing I did, not to the page itself. > > Yeah, categories are for the page itself, not the edit. I'm not sure if > our guide for editors covers that, but you might like to read it and > expand it with this tip if it doesn't. > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/EditorGuide This webpage mentions some times that categories refers to pages. Felipe