Bug#1028530: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ says tag 'forky' exists, bugs.debian.org says it does not

Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.www
Message-ID <60c98b19-bf67-775b-4555-854f407d6faf__12521.2713539199$1675193252$gmane$org@debian.org>
Control: retitle -1 www.debian.org/Bugs should get tags from BTS

Hi,

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 12:13:41 +0000 Simon McVittie <[email protected]> wrote:
> To reproduce:
> - look at the list of valid tags in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/
> - see that trixie, trixie-ignore, forky and forky-ignore are in the list
> - try to tag a bug "+ trixie forky" (I tried to do this in #885563)
> 
> Expected result: either tagging a bug + forky succeeds, or the list of
> valid tags does not include forky until it becomes relevant.
> 
> Actual result: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/ lists forky and forky-ignore,
> but when I tried to use the forky tag, the BTS replied:

This is now fixed; I filed bug 1029978 without noticing this bug. 
1029978 got promptly fixed: thanks.

> Ideally the web page would receive the list of valid tags from the BTS
> instead of having its own idea of what is valid.

I think this remains true. I this case I pinged on IRC for an update of 
the tags and then continued to update the documents. In hindsight that 
wasn't too smart.

Paul
OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, 495 B) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.